The stated benefits of under-display fingerprint scanners were fantastic. A built-in sensor opens the phone when you just place your finger on the touch screen as you normally would. While in actuality they are worse than the alternatives, that was the fantasy.
Table of Contents
A Brief History of Fingerprint Scanners
In the 2010s, fingerprint scanners made their debut on smartphones. In 2013, Apple introduced the iPhone 5S with a fingerprint scanner, and a year later, Samsung did the same with the Galaxy Note 4.
The initial fingerprint readers were capacitive devices. Your fingerprint is read by measuring the space between the small electrodes that cover the sensor. The difference depends on how far apart the ridges on your finger are.
The vast majority of smartphones have fingerprint scanners before the end of the decade. Change, though, was on the way. With Face ID, Apple took a step toward face recognition in 2017. The first in-display fingerprint scanners were being implemented by Android vendor Vivo at the same time.
There are still numerous Android smartphones with the original sort of fingerprint scanner, although in-display scanners have become common on “flagship” Android phones. Today, Apple has all but abandoned fingerprint scanners for Face ID—only the “retro” iPhone SE has Touch ID.
Related: Huawei is developing a smartphone with all-screen fingerprint scanner and in-display selfie
The Promise of In-Display Fingerprint Scanners
The Vivo X20 Plus, released at the beginning of 2018, was the first smartphone with an in-display fingerprint scanner, also known as an under-display fingerprint scanner. It made use of an optical scanner, which uses a small camera to capture a picture of your finger after shining light on it.
I can still recall how captivated I was by this novel idea. At the time, fingerprint scanners were still frequently found on the front of phones, on the bottom bezel. It may still be on the front without taking up any room on the bezel thanks to an in-display fingerprint scanner.
It had a really futuristic feel about it. How great is it that your phone will automatically scan your finger and unlock when you simply place it on the display? There is no need to search for a specific location on the phone’s back or bezel. Simply touch the screen!
Of fact, it was not at all how the first in-display scanners functioned. It was necessary to place your finger in a very exact location, which was typically marked by a fingerprint symbol on the screen. They were also considerably slower than the fingerprint scanners of the “classic” design.
But that was all right. Though there are always issues with cutting-edge technology, the potential is intriguing. I can picture a day in the future when you won’t need to place your finger in a very exact location and wait a little period of time for it to be scanned. a time when scanning your finger will only need a quick swipe on the lock screen.
The Future We Got Instead
Let’s go back in time to the present, the year 2022. In-display fingerprint scanners are still being included in high-end Android phone launches. Since 2018, Samsung has begun utilizing the technology. In-display scanners weren’t used by Google until the Pixel 6 in 2021.
In the previous five years, technology has advanced. Ultrasonic in-display scanners have gradually taken the place of optical in-display scanners, which are less secure. They map your fingerprint using ultrasonic pulses.
The issue is that these advancements aren’t significant enough. I didn’t anticipate that using an in-display scanner in 2022 would be such a big improvement over 2018. They’re not even close to being as excellent as the “classic” type fingerprint scanners, in my opinion.
For instance, Samsung’s newest and best flagship smartphone line, the Galaxy S22, has in-display fingerprint scanners. By now, you’d think it would be satisfactory, right? Of course, everyone may experience things differently, but for me, it’s practically useless.
Frequently, it takes three or more passes for my finger to register on the scanner. If it weren’t for Android’s “Smart Unlock” function, this would be even more annoying; however, I’ve activated Samsung’s facial recognition capability, which is still inferior to Apple’s Face ID.
Embrace the Face
After using Face ID, I believe Apple is correct that face recognition is the future. Under-display scanners had a lot of potentials, but their practical use fell well short of expectations.
The first smartphone with an in-display scanner originally arrived about five years ago. Why do outdated scanners on cheap Android phones continue to surpass them? Android makers should concentrate on competing with Face ID if they don’t want to employ outdated scanners.
Face ID, in my opinion, is just as quick and accurate as a traditional fingerprint scanner. It’s not ideal—less it’s precise while wearing a mask, for instance—but it’s still pretty excellent. However, Face ID’s main advantage is that it is genuinely secure.
Face ID is a security feature that may be utilized on iPhones for tasks like completing App Store purchases. The face recognition capabilities on Android phones don’t work like that. You will require a secondary security method for purchases and other transactions if you decide to utilize that method on the lock screen.
It would be fantastic to have a phone with a full touch screen that can scan your finger, but that hasn’t occurred yet. I’m not sure whether we’ll ever get there at this point. It’s time to go to a better project.
