We’re back with another exciting comparison! In this article, we’re diving into a showdown between vivo’s latest vivo V40 5G and the HONOR 200.
Both smartphones come in under PHP30,000 and share the same chipset, but what sets them apart? Let’s explore their differences and see which device might be the better choice for you.
When it comes to design, both the vivo V40 and HONOR 200 present a premium aesthetic. The V40 features a Lotus Purple design with a glass body and elegantly curved edges, while the HONOR 200 opts for a Pro Black colorway with a plastic body and a matte finish. While neither phone is particularly flashy, both have a sleek and appealing look.
In terms of dimensions, the vivo V40 is slightly slimmer at 7.6mm thick, compared to the 7.7mm of the HONOR 200.
However, despite being thinner, the V40 weighs 190g, making it a bit heavier than the 187g HONOR 200.
While both phones have curved edges, the thicker frame of the HONOR 200 may offer a better grip, which is crucial for a secure hold, especially considering their smooth textures that can make them a bit slippery.
Ultimately, your choice may depend on whether you prefer a lighter, slimmer device or one that feels sturdier in hand.
If durability is a key concern, the vivo V40 boasts an IP68 rating, making it more resistant to dust and water than the HONOR 200.
How about we do some display comparison? The vivo V40 features a larger 6.78-inch display, slightly outpacing the 6.7-inch screen on the HONOR 200.
The V40 also utilizes a superior AMOLED panel, while the HONOR 200 comes with an OLED screen. Both devices offer a 1.5K resolution paired with a 120Hz refresh rate, ensuring smooth visuals.
The V40’s display further impresses with support for HDR10+ and a peak brightness of 4500 nits, surpassing the 4000 nits of the HONOR 200.
Additionally, the V40 includes a Schott Xensation Alpha glass for added protection, a feature absent in the HONOR 200. Both displays excel in terms of color accuracy and vibrancy, making them suitable for both entertainment and productivity tasks.
In the camera department, the vivo V40 comes equipped with a dual camera setup, a 50MP main lens with OIS and a 50MP ultrawide lens.
In contrast, the HONOR 200 boasts a triple camera system, featuring a 50MP main lens with OIS, a 50MP telephoto lens, and a 12MP ultrawide lens. Both devices share a 50MP front-facing camera.
When it comes to image quality, the vivo V40 tends to produce natural and vibrant photos, while the HONOR 200 delivers sharper images.
Both phones excel in outdoor photography, offering impressive detail, color accuracy, and a wide dynamic range. The HONOR 200 is particularly effective at producing deep blacks and shadows in its shots.
For selfies, while both devices capture decent images, the HONOR 200 leans towards a more natural look with sharper details, whereas the V40 excels in producing high-quality selfies, even if they lack some of the finer details.
Both phones can record videos up to 4K@30FPS, making them versatile options for capturing your moments. If camera performance is your main criteria, the HONOR 200 has the edge with its additional telephoto lens, but the V40’s Aura Light Portrait System enhances its low-light performance and portrait capabilities, making it an appealing choice for those who enjoy creative photography.
Performance-wise, both smartphones are powered by the same Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset.
They both feature 12GB of RAM with the HONOR 200 offering a larger 512GB storage option, compared to the 256GB in the V40.
Both devices run on Android 14, with the V40 using Funtouch 14 and the HONOR 200 employing MagicOS 8.
In comparison, benchmarks results are quite similar. Take a look at the photos below.
vivo V40 5G and HONOR 200 Benchmark Results
In battery comparison, the vivo V40 houses a 5500mAh Lithium-Ion battery, while the HONOR 200 is equipped with a 5200mAh Silicon-Carbon battery.
The HONOR 200 supports 100W fast charging, while the V40 offers 80W.
During our video loop test, the V40 lasted about 21 hours and 51 minutes, while the HONOR 200 provided approximately 19 hours and 15 minutes of usage.
When charging from 0 to 100%, the V40 took around 48 minutes, whereas the HONOR 200 completed the task in 42 minutes.
Although Silicon-Carbon batteries show potential for improvement over conventional Lithium-Ion batteries, their long-term reliability remains uncertain. If you’re looking for a larger battery capacity and proven performance, the V40 is the safer bet.
The HONOR 200 is priced at PHP24,999 for the 12GB + 512GB storage model, while the vivo V40 is available in two variants, with the model we reviewed priced at PHP26,999.
In this comparison, both smartphones share similar specifications, they each have unique features that cater to different user preferences.
The HONOR 200 may be the better option for those seeking a more versatile camera setup and larger storage at a slightly lower price.
However, if you prioritize display quality, battery life, and features like the Aura Light Portrait System, the vivo V40 stands out as a solid choice.
So, what are your thoughts on these two devices? Which one captures your interest more? Let us know in the comments below! Additionally, for a more detailed exploration of vivo V40 5G and HONOR 200, don’t forget to check out our video comparison on our YouTube Channel.
ManilaShaker is a tech media producing insightful and helpful content for our local and growing international audience. Our goal is to create a premier Philippine digital consumer electronics resource that provides the most objective reviews and comparisons globally.
